AskLegal.my

DBKL Removes 25,000 Illegal Banners A Month. The Maximum Fine Is Still RM2,000.

11 min read

The enforcement numbers explain the problem better than any legal analysis.

DBKL removes between 25,000 and 30,000 unauthorised banners and bunting every month. In one year it removed 1.3 million illegal posters, banners, bunting and stickers, and was close to 500,000 in the first half of the following year.

And the maximum fine is RM2,000 under the 1982 Advertisement By-Laws and the 1991 Vandalism By-Laws.

That gap is the whole story. A fine capped at RM2,000 against an advertising channel that reaches an entire city is not a deterrent — it is a cost of doing business.

What makes an advertisement illegal

The legal framework:

  • Local Government Act 1976 (LGA 1976)
  • Advertisements (Federal Territory) By-Laws 1982 — DBKL bases enforcement on section 3
  • Vandalism By-Laws 1991
  • Section 11(2) of the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 — an oddly specific provision requiring all publications to bear the name and address of the printer and publisher

These laws give local authorities the power to create and regulate local advertising rules, so rules vary across states — check your own PBT, whether DBKL, MBPJ, MBSP, MPKJ or another.

The practical rule: commercial advertising in public space without approval is an offence. That covers banners, bunting, posters and stickers on streetlights, trees, road dividers and road signs.

Why the Ah Long stickers never stop

Three reasons, and they are all structural.

1. The phone numbers are disposable. DBKL has worked with MCMC to cancel telephone numbers displayed on illegal advertisements — 1,829 numbers submitted, of which 1,256 were terminated.

But that only partly works. As then Petaling Jaya mayor Datuk Mohd Azizi Mohd Zain explained:

"I was informed that these mobile numbers are used to screen the callers and the genuine prospects will be contacted from a different line… We have also caught individuals putting up stickers and have fined them. But they are just the 'small fish' hired to paste the stickers."

2. The people caught are not the people responsible. Enforcement reaches the person with the glue, not the person paying for it.

3. Removal is expensive and repetitive. Many banners are secured with steel wires or cables tightly wrapped around poles and street lamps. For safety, DBKL often performs removals at night using ladders and cranes.

Save Kuala Lumpur coalition chairman Datuk M. Ali put the cost point directly — that ratepayers are effectively subsidising businesses that profit from illegal advertising:

"When DBKL talks about management and operating costs, people imagine paperwork and offices. But when it comes to illegal banners, it is very basic, very physical spending. Officers, contractors and support staff have to be sent out to locate the banners, take them down and dispose of them. And this is not a one-time job."

Because removal often happens after hours, public money goes on overtime, fuel and equipment maintenance — lorries, cranes, mechanical cutters and safety equipment. Nearly 80% of DBKL's RM2.835 billion budget in the reported year went to management and operating costs.

There are safety consequences too. Taman Desa Residents Association chairman Wong Chan Choy noted that banners tied to trees often cover tags used for tree safety assessments, delaying inspections, increasing storm risk and driving up maintenance costs.

The enforcement shift — going after premises owners

DBKL changed tactic, and this is the part businesses need to know.

Rather than chasing the person pasting stickers, DBKL went after the owners of premises where the advertised event is to be held.

From 1 June of the relevant year: any commercial advertising via banners, bunting or posters without approval can result in the suspension or termination of the business licence of premises owners — including management of shopping complexes and exhibition halls.

DBKL had previously issued two warning notices before a fine, but because the fine was not effective, moved to revoking business licences instead.

Enforcement volume in the reported period: over 670 compounds issued and 520 cases taken to court.

A note on where the banners go: through Local Agenda 21, illegal banners collected in the city have been upcycled into reusable bags, aprons and stationery cases.

Signboards — a separate and active enforcement area

If you run a business, this is more likely to affect you than Ah Long stickers.

All storefront signboards must comply with local PBT regulations and obtain approval before installation.

The language rule is the one catching businesses out. Under the Advertisement (Federal Territories) By-Laws 1982 and the LGA 1976, DBKL requires that all business signboards and advertisements be in the national language, though other languages may also be included. The words in the national language must take precedence and be larger than the words in other languages.

DBKL has been issuing summonses to business owners who fail to include a Bahasa Melayu translation alongside the main language.

This has raised a live question about trademarks. Under the Trademarks Act 2019 a trademark is any sign capable of visual representation distinguishing one business's goods or services from another's. Whether a registered trademark displayed on a signboard must nonetheless carry a Bahasa Melayu translation is exactly the question DBKL's enforcement has provoked. If your signage is your registered mark, take advice.

Common violations reported include unfamiliarity with licensing requirements, size restrictions, language proportions and application procedures, with consequences including fines, removal notices and business licence renewal issues.

The reform argument

Commentary in January 2026 contrasted the treatment of "visual litter" with physical waste.

From 1 January, courts were empowered to impose fines of up to RM2,000 and mandatory community service for minor littering offences, with repeat offenders fined up to RM3,000 — while the illegal advertisement maximum remains RM2,000 under by-laws dating from 1982 and 1991.

The Visit Malaysia 2026 angle was raised repeatedly: that tourists form impressions within minutes of arrival, and the clutter of illegal banners shows weak enforcement, with compliant businesses hoping for consistent enforcement so everyone operates under the same rules.

What to actually do

If you run a business:

  • Get your signboard licensed before installation, through your PBT.
  • Check the language proportions — national language first and larger.
  • Do not put up banners or bunting in public space without approval, and be aware that the premises owner's licence is now at risk, not just yours.
  • If your signage carries a registered trademark, take advice on the translation requirement.

If you are a resident:

  • Report illegal advertisements to your local council rather than removing them yourself — some are secured with steel wire and removal is genuinely hazardous.
  • Residents' associations in some areas keep their own neighbourhoods clear, with one association reported as doing so for the past ten years, informing DBKL before removing.

If you are approached by an "Ah Long":

  • The advertisement being illegal tells you something about the lender. Licensed moneylenders operate under the Moneylenders Act 1951 and do not advertise on lamp posts.
  • Do not engage. Report to police.

FAQ

Are Ah Long stickers illegal?

Yes. Commercial advertising in public space without local authority approval is an offence under the Local Government Act 1976 and by-laws including the Advertisements (Federal Territory) By-Laws 1982 and Vandalism By-Laws 1991.

What is the penalty?

The maximum fine remains RM2,000 under the 1982 Advertisement By-Laws and 1991 Vandalism By-Laws.

Why does nobody stop them?

Enforcement catches the people pasting stickers, described by one mayor as the "small fish" hired to do it, rather than those responsible. Phone numbers on the ads are dummy screening numbers, with genuine prospects contacted from a different line.

How many are removed?

DBKL removes between 25,000 and 30,000 unauthorised banners and bunting monthly, and removed 1.3 million illegal posters, banners, bunting and stickers in one reported year.

Can a business lose its licence over this?

Yes. DBKL moved to suspending or terminating business licences of premises owners where an advertised event is to be held, after finding fines ineffective.

Do signboards need to be in Malay?

DBKL requires business signboards and advertisements to be in the national language, which may be accompanied by other languages, with the national language taking precedence and being larger.

What about my registered trademark?

DBKL has issued summonses to business owners who fail to include a Bahasa Melayu translation alongside the main language, which has raised questions about signage carrying registered trademarks. Take advice.

Should I take down illegal banners myself?

Report them to your council instead. Many are secured with steel wire or cable and DBKL removes them at night with ladders and cranes for safety reasons.

This article is general legal information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create a lawyer–client relationship.

Specific to this article: advertising and signboard rules are local by-laws and differ between councils — the provisions cited relate principally to Kuala Lumpur (DBKL) and readers elsewhere must check their own PBT's by-laws. Enforcement figures come from press reporting covering different periods and are not directly comparable; they indicate scale rather than a current annual rate. Whether a registered trademark displayed on a signboard must carry a Bahasa Melayu translation is an active question raised by DBKL's enforcement and is not settled here — businesses in that position should take trademark and regulatory advice. Penalty figures are as reported and by-laws are periodically revised. Statements attributed to mayors, officials and residents' associations are as reported in the cited coverage. If you have received a summons, a removal notice or a licence suspension, contact the issuing council and take advice.

Spot something outdated or wrong? Tell us — we’ll verify and correct it, with the correction noted.

Key sources (8) — how this was verified
  • The Star, 20 January 2026, "Waste of time, DBKL resources in removing illegal ads"that DBKL removes between 25,000 and 30,000 unauthorised banners and bunting monthly; that many are secured with steel wires or cables tightly wrapped around poles and street lamps, with removals often performed at night using ladders and cranes for safety reasons; that nearly 80% of DBKL's RM2.835bil budget last year was allocated to management and operating costs; Save Kuala Lumpur coalition chairman Datuk M. Ali's statement that ratepayers were effectively subsidising businesses that profited from illegal advertising, and his quoted explanation that "when it comes to illegal banners, it is very basic, very physical spending… And this is not a one-time job"; and the note that removal after hours means public money spent on overtime pay, fuel and equipment maintenance, requiring lorries, cranes, mechanical cutters and safety equipment: https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/metro-news/2026/01/20/waste-of-time-dbkl-resources-in-removing-illegal-ads
  • The Star, 20 January 2026, "'Go after culprits of illegal banners too'"that the maximum fine remains RM2,000 under the 1982 Advertisement By-laws and 1991 Vandalism By-laws, prompting questions over whether DBKL is serious about enforcement; the contrast with littering, where from 1 January courts are empowered to impose fines of up to RM2,000 and mandatory community service for minor offences, with repeat offenders fined up to RM3,000; Taman Desa Residents Association chairman Wong Chan Choy's point that banners tied to trees often cover tags used for tree safety assessments, delaying inspections, increasing risks during storms and driving up maintenance costs; and the Visit Malaysia 2026 concern that tourists form impressions within minutes of arrival and the clutter of illegal banners shows weak enforcement: https://www.thestar.com.my/metro/metro-news/2026/01/20/go-after-culprits-of-illegal-banners-too
  • StarProperty, "DBKL: Advertisers now face harsher penalties"that from 1 June, any commercial advertising via banners, bunting or posters without approval can result in the suspension or termination of the business licence of premises owners such as management of shopping complexes and exhibition halls; that in the previous year DBKL removed 1.3 million illegal posters, banners, bunting and stickers and was close to 500,000 in the first half of the year; that DBKL worked with MCMC to cancel telephone numbers displayed on illegal advertisements, with 1,829 numbers submitted of which 1,256 were terminated; that over 670 compounds were issued and 520 cases taken to court; and that through Local Agenda 21 illegal banners collected in the city are made into reusable bags, aprons and stationery cases: https://www.starproperty.my/news/dbkl-advertisers-now-face-harsher-penalties/78230
  • AskLegal existing page, "If Ah Long ads are illegal in Malaysia, why do we keep seeing them?" — DBKL's collaboration with MCMC to bar phone numbers displayed on the ads; Petaling Jaya mayor Datuk Mohd Azizi Mohd Zain's quoted explanation that "these mobile numbers are used to screen the callers and the genuine prospects will be contacted from a different line… We have also caught individuals putting up stickers and have fined them. But they are just the 'small fish' hired to paste the stickers"; s.11(2) of the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 requiring all publications to have the name and address of the printer and publisher; the observation that a lot of illegal ads in KL are put up by private businesses and exhibition organisers; and that DBKL used to send two warning notices before issuing a fine, but because the fine was not effective moved to revoking business licences: https://asklegal.my/p/illegal-ads-public-spaces-ah-long-massage-dbkl-local-council
  • BERNAMA, 25 November 2024, "Enforcement Against Signboard Violations Aimed To Ensure By-Law Compliance – DBKL"DBKL's statement that enforcement operations against signboard licensing violations aim to ensure business premises comply with established by-laws including the Advertisement (Federal Territories) By-Laws 1982 and the Local Government Act 1976; and the requirement that all business signboards and advertisements be in the national language, though they may include other languages, with the written words in the national language taking precedence and being larger than words in other languages: https://bernama.com/en/news.php?id=2367535
  • NBS, "DBKL's crackdown on signboards: Are registered trademarks the next target?" — DBKL's enforcement of regulations regarding signboards displaying registered trademarks, issuing summonses to business owners who fail to include a Bahasa Melayu translation alongside the main language; the definition of a trademark under the Trademarks Act 2019 as any sign visually represented to distinguish one business's goods or services from another's; DBKL basing enforcement on the Local Government Act 1976 and the Advertisements (Federal Territory) By-Laws 1982, specifically section 3; and the note that these laws give local authorities power to create and regulate local advertising rules, so rules vary across states and readers should check their local by-laws: https://nbs.com.my/dbkls-crackdown-on-signboards-are-registered-trademarks-the-next-target/
  • Great Sign Advertising, "2025 Malaysia Signage Compliance Guide" — the requirement that all storefront signboards comply with local PBT regulations such as DBKL, MBPJ, MBSP and MPKJ and obtain necessary approvals before installation; and the common violations arising from unfamiliarity with signboard licensing requirements, size restrictions, language proportions or application procedures, resulting in fines, removal notices and business licence renewal issues: https://www.greatsignadvertising.com/latestnews/nid/171503/
  • Malay Mail, 21 September 2020 — the DBKL Wangsa Maju branch manager's account that before the MCO, DBKL had to take down 400 to 500 illegal advertisements daily in that parliamentary area, dropping by 50 per cent during the movement control order: https://www.malaymail.com/amp/news/malaysia/2020/09/21/dbkl-illegal-advertisements-down-50pc-at-wangsa-maju-during-mco/1905338