NFA Does Not Mean Closed. And The Police Are Not The Ones Who Decide Whether To Charge.
Two things explain most "the police did nothing" complaints, and neither is usually what people assume.
First: the police only investigate. They do not decide whether to charge. That is the Attorney General's decision. So if your case ended in NFA, complaining to the police station is aiming at the wrong target.
Second: the police are not obliged to actively investigate every report. Under the Criminal Procedure Code, the duty depends on whether the offence is seizable or non-seizable.
| Seizable (arrestable) | Non-seizable | |
|---|---|---|
| What | Listed in the CPC First Schedule — generally serious offences | Minor offences |
| Police powers | May investigate and arrest without a warrant | Cannot investigate freely |
| Duty to investigate | Duty-bound to investigate | Need an order from the Public Prosecutor (in practice a DPP) under CPC s.108 |
So a report of a non-seizable matter may legitimately see no active investigation. That is the law working as designed, not the police ignoring you.
What NFA actually means
"No Further Action" is a classification, not a closure.
Only a Deputy Public Prosecutor has the power to direct NFA on a file.
And it can be reversed. NFA does not permanently close a case — it can be reclassified and referred again if new evidence emerges.
Police have said so publicly. In the Faisal Halim acid attack case, Bukit Aman CID director Datuk Seri Mohd Shuhaily Mohd Zain explained that NFA status referred to particular arrests and leads found to be unrelated, and that:
"This is the standard operating procedure in any investigation. If an arrest does not contribute to or assist the investigation, the deputy public prosecutor will classify the case as NFA until new developments or information arise."
Investigation continued despite the NFA classification.
Other outcomes you may encounter:
- NOD — the report does not disclose a criminal offence
- RTM — referred to a Magistrate, where the matter is civil or quasi-civil
- ROA — referred to another agency for action
The escalation ladder
Step 1 — Appeal the NFA to the Attorney General's Chambers.
Since the AG decides on prosecution, you can appeal an NFA and ask him to reconsider.
- Send a written appeal to the Prosecution Division, Attorney General's Chambers
- Address it to your State Prosecution Unit, or send directly to headquarters in Putrajaya
- New evidence is what moves the needle. The AG's decision will be strongly influenced if there is new evidence
Step 2 — Complain to the OCS or OCPD, in writing.
If the police did not take your statement, or took no action on your report, complain in writing to the Officer in Charge of the Station (OCS) or the Officer in Charge of the Police District (OCPD).
CC the complaint to the Prosecution Division of the AGC. That copy is what gives it weight.
Alternatively, complain directly to the AGC's Prosecution Division, which will then prompt the police station for a response.
Step 3 — Lodge a covering report.
A covering report supplements or corrects an earlier report. Practitioner commentary notes something worth understanding: "The real sting of a Covering Report is it is the first report made" — the sequence and timing of reports matters.
Step 4 — External oversight.
| Body | Scope |
|---|---|
| IPCC | Misconduct by PDRM members and officers, under the IPCC Act 2022 — ipcc.gov.my |
| EAIC | Wider — supervises 21 government agencies under the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission Act 2009 |
| SUHAKAM | Human rights violations — suhakam.org.my |
| MACC | Corruption specifically |
On EAIC specifically, its own guidance to AskLegal was: "It is up to the individual himself whether to lodge his/her complaint with EAIC or the respective agency. However, if there is no action taken after a complaint lodged to the respective agency, the complainant can pursue the matter with EAIC."
Important: even if you submit two reports, only one investigation will take place. Per EAIC: "If a complaint is filed and EAIC has commenced its investigation on the complaint, the relevant agency must not commence another investigation on the same complaint to prevent a dual investigation."
Note the jurisdictional change. Police custodial deaths moved out of EAIC's jurisdiction with the establishment of the IPCC — see (If Someone Dies In Police Custody, An Inquest Is Mandatory. Here Is What A Family Can Do.).
Step 5 — Get a lawyer.
If the matter is significant, engage one. They can correspond with the AGC and the police in terms that get answered, and advise on whether a civil claim is the better route where a criminal one has stalled.
Getting a copy of your report
You are generally entitled to a copy, but note the exception: you will not get a report at all if the investigation or prosecution would be compromised by releasing it.
If you do not get your report on time without a valid reason, you can complain to the AGC.
The realistic context
Attrition in the criminal justice system is very high, and it is not all police inaction.
Analysis by PEMANDU indicated that of the 2.5 million crimes reported in 2009, less than 10% resulted in the charging of a suspect and only 5.6% reached a verdict.
Reasons for the gap between reports and investigation papers include reports not disclosing a criminal offence, matters being civil and referred to a Magistrate, inconclusive initial investigations resulting in NFA, and referral to other agencies.
And of investigation papers registered, roughly 20% resulted in prosecution — with one stated explanation being that prosecution policy is not to prosecute unless there is around an 80% chance of securing a conviction on the face of the investigation paper.
That threshold is the single biggest reason cases stop. It is not indifference; it is an evidential judgment. Which is also why new evidence is the most effective thing you can supply.
What to actually do
- Establish what happened to your report. Ask for the classification — NFA, NOD, RTM, ROA — and the investigating officer's name and contact.
- Work out whether the offence is seizable. If non-seizable, police need a DPP's order under s.108 CPC before investigating, and inaction may be lawful.
- Gather new evidence. CCTV, messages, witness details, documents, bank records. This is what changes an NFA.
- Write to the AGC Prosecution Division appealing the NFA, attaching the new evidence.
- Write to the OCS or OCPD if your statement was never taken, CC the AGC.
- Escalate to the IPCC for police misconduct, or EAIC for wider enforcement agency failures.
- Consider whether the matter is really civil. Many "no action" complaints involve disputes that are properly civil — debts, contracts, family matters. A Magistrate referral (RTM) is a signal.
- Get a lawyer if the amounts or stakes justify it.
FAQ
Why did nothing happen after my police report?
Possibly because the offence is non-seizable, in which case police need an order from a Deputy Public Prosecutor under s.108 CPC before investigating. It may also have been classified NOD, RTM, ROA or NFA.
What does NFA mean?
No Further Action — a classification directed by a Deputy Public Prosecutor. It does not permanently close the case and can be reclassified if new evidence emerges.
Can I appeal an NFA?
Yes. Send a written appeal to the Prosecution Division of the Attorney General's Chambers, either your state unit or headquarters in Putrajaya. New evidence strongly influences the decision.
Do the police decide whether to charge someone?
No. Police investigate; the Attorney General decides on prosecution.
Who do I complain to if police took no action?
Write to the OCS or OCPD and copy the AGC's Prosecution Division, or complain directly to the AGC. For misconduct, the IPCC; for wider enforcement agency issues, the EAIC; for human rights violations, SUHAKAM.
Can I complain to two bodies at once?
You can lodge with either, but only one investigation will proceed — EAIC has stated that where it has commenced an investigation, the relevant agency must not commence another on the same complaint.
Can I get a copy of my police report?
Generally yes, unless releasing it would compromise the investigation or prosecution. If it is not provided on time without valid reason, complain to the AGC.
Why are so few reports prosecuted?
Attrition is high at every stage. PEMANDU analysis of 2009 data found under 10% of reported crimes resulted in a charge and 5.6% reached a verdict, with prosecution policy reported as requiring around an 80% prospect of conviction.
This article is general legal information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create a lawyer–client relationship.
Specific to this article: the seizable/non-seizable distinction determines whether police are duty-bound to investigate, and whether a particular offence falls in the CPC First Schedule is a legal question — take advice rather than assuming inaction is improper. Complaint routes, addresses and the division of jurisdiction between the IPCC, EAIC and SUHAKAM have changed, notably with the establishment of the IPCC in July 2023, which took police custodial deaths out of EAIC's jurisdiction; check current scope with each body. The attrition statistics cited are from PEMANDU analysis of 2009 data and a 2011 justice audit and are not current — they are included to show the scale of the gap, not the present rate. The reported prosecution threshold of around an 80% prospect of conviction comes from that same audit and should not be treated as a published current policy. EAIC's statements are as provided in correspondence reported by AskLegal. If your matter is significant, engage a lawyer — correspondence from a firm is answered differently, and a stalled criminal case does not preclude a civil claim.
Spot something outdated or wrong? Tell us — we’ll verify and correct it, with the correction noted.
Key sources (8) — how this was verified
- AskLegal existing page, "What can you do if no action was taken on your police report in Malaysia?" — the point that police only have the power to investigate while it is the Attorney General who decides whether to bring a suspect to court; that an NFA can be appealed to the Attorney General for reconsideration, with the decision strongly influenced by new evidence; the route of a written appeal to the Prosecution Division, Attorney General's Chambers, addressed either to the State Prosecution Unit or directly to headquarters in Putrajaya; that you will not get a copy of your report at all if the investigation or prosecution would be compromised by it, and that failure to provide it on time without valid reason can be complained of to the AGC; and that where police did not take your statement or took no action, you can complain in writing to the OCS or OCPD, CC the Prosecution Division of the AGC, or complain directly to the AGC which will prompt the police station for a response: https://asklegal.my/p/no-action-police-report-malaysia-what-to-do
- Arik Zakri, "Making a covering report and counter report, and 'withdrawing' a police report" — the explanation that police may decide a report does not disclose an offence or a criminal complaint and refer it to a magistrate (RTM); that police may notify that No Further Action (NFA) is directed for the file, and that only a Deputy Public Prosecutor has the power to make that decision; and the observation that "the real sting of a Covering Report is it is the first report made": https://www.arikzakri.com/ariks-writings/covering-report-and-counter-report
- Malay Mail, 8 May 2025, "NFA status doesn't mean case closed, police say as Faisal Halim acid attack probe continues" — Bukit Aman CID director Datuk Seri Mohd Shuhaily Mohd Zain's explanation that NFA status referred to particular arrests and leads found unrelated to the case, and that "this is the standard operating procedure in any investigation. If an arrest does not contribute to or assist the investigation, the deputy public prosecutor will classify the case as NFA until new developments or information arise", with investigation continuing: https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2025/05/08/nfa-status-doesnt-mean-case-closed-police-say-as-faisal-halim-acid-attack-probe-continues/176067
- AskLegal, "M'sian authorities have to investigate if their officers mess up. But what if they don't?" — the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission Act 2009 giving the EAIC powers to supervise 21 government agencies; the distinction that the MACC deals specifically with corruption while the EAIC's scope is wider; EAIC's statement that "it is up to the individual himself whether to lodge his/her complaint with EAIC or the respective agency. However, if there is no action taken after a complaint lodge to the respective agency, the complainant can pursue the matter with EAIC"; and EAIC's statement that "if a complaint is filed and EAIC has commenced its investigation on the complaint, the relevant agency must not commence another investigation on the same complaint to prevent a dual investigation": https://asklegal.my/p/eaic-integrity-report-no-action-pdrm-jpj-follow-up
- Justice Audit Malaysia, "Prosecutions & Trials (2011)" — the PEMANDU analysis that of the 2.5 million crimes reported in 2009, less than 10% resulted in the charging of a suspect and only 5.6% reached a verdict; the explanations for the disparity between reported crime and investigation papers registered, including that the initial report does not disclose a criminal offence (NOD), discloses a civil or quasi-civil action referred to the Magistrate (RTM), results in a finding of No Further Action (NFA) after inconclusive initial investigation, or is referred to other agencies for action (ROA); and the reported explanation for the gap between investigation papers registered and prosecutions, being a policy of not prosecuting unless there is around an 80% chance of securing a conviction on the face of the investigation paper: https://malaysia.justiceaudit.org/?page_id=20
- Public Complaints Bureau (SPAB) FAQ for the Royal Malaysia Police — the types of complaint that can be lodged including delay in action or no action, unfair action, abuse of power, misconduct of public officials, failure to adhere to procedures, failure of enforcement and unsatisfactory quality of service; and the acceptance of anonymous or whistleblower complaints where the matter is serious and there is sufficient information to investigate: https://rmp.spab.gov.my/eApps/web/info/moha_rmp/faq_en.html
- Malay Mail, 11 February 2022 — an illustration of NFA in practice, where a police report was marked NFA by Bukit Aman on the basis that it was "not related to the case investigated", as confirmed by CID director Datuk Seri Abdul Jalil Hassan: https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2022/02/11/report-bukit-aman-marks-macc-police-report-against-activist-lalitha-as-no-f/2041012
- Human Rights Watch, "No Answers, No Apology: Police Abuses and Accountability in Malaysia" — recommendations on external oversight, including providing IGP standing orders on procedures for arrest, investigations and deaths in lock-ups to oversight bodies including SUHAKAM and the EAIC, and instructing police stations to cooperate fully with external oversight agencies by providing access to police files and witnesses. Cited for the oversight context; the report dates from 2014 and predates the IPCC: https://www.hrw.org/report/2014/04/01/no-answers-no-apology/police-abuses-and-accountability-malaysia