Sambung Bayar Contracts Are Void From The Start. But There Is A Legal Way To Do The Same Thing.
Sambung bayar deals are illegal, and the contract you signed is worthless. Those are two separate problems and both matter.
The offence. Under s.38 of the Hire Purchase Act 1967:
"Every person who, by the disposal or sale of any goods comprised in a hire-purchase agreement, or by the removal of the goods, or by any other means, defrauds or attempts to defraud the owner shall be guilty of an offence."
Penalty: a fine of up to RM30,000, or up to 3 years' imprisonment, or both.
The contract. Under s.24 of the Contracts Act 1950, an agreement whose object or consideration is unlawful is void — what lawyers call void ab initio, invalid from the start. If either party breaches it, no legal action can be taken.
But here is what almost every article on this topic leaves out.
KPDN's own Director-General of Enforcement, Datuk Azman Adam, made the point explicitly: while a sambung bayar contract is not legally valid, this does not mean someone else cannot pay for the vehicle and use it — because an assignment of rights under a hire purchase agreement is permitted under s.12 of the Hire Purchase Act 1967.
So the problem is not the arrangement. It is doing it behind the bank's back.
Why the bank matters
When you buy a car on hire purchase, the bank owns it until the loan is settled. You are the hirer, not the owner. That is why you cannot sell it without the financier's permission — and the hire purchase agreement contains an express condition saying so.
The consequence flows from that ownership. A sambung bayar car sold to a new "owner" remains the property of the original owner in law, no matter what was signed.
The five things that actually go wrong
1. Every summons is yours. Traffic fines are issued against the registered owner, not the driver. If the "buyer" runs a red light, the saman is in your name — and under the 2026 system, unpaid saman means automatic blacklisting after 60 days, which blocks your roadtax and licence renewal. See (Zaman Tunggu Diskaun 80% Dah Tamat. Mulai 1 Januari 2026, Lambat Bayar Bermakna Bayar Penuh.).
2. Every missed payment is yours. The bank holds the original hirer accountable. Missed instalments damage your credit score and legal action from the bank comes to you.
3. The bank can repossess regardless of who is driving. If the loan defaults, the financier has the right to repossess the vehicle whatever the buyer has paid.
4. The buyer has no protection at all. They do not legally own the car after months or years of instalments. If the seller takes it back, there is very little recourse — the contract is void.
5. Criminal exposure runs both ways. If a seller disappears or takes the car back after taking payment, that can fall under s.420 of the Penal Code (cheating). And if the buyer uses the vehicle for criminal activity, the consequences land on the registered owner.
Also note s.46 of the Hire Purchase Act 1967 — a general penalty of up to RM3,000 or 6 months for contraventions of the Act.
Enforcement is real
The Home Ministry confirmed in a written reply to the Dewan Rakyat that action can be taken against owners who pawn their vehicles or sambung bayar to third parties without the bank's knowledge and approval, and that enforcement sits with KPDN.
What to do instead
If you want out of the loan:
- Talk to your bank first. Settle the loan on sale, or ask about a proper transfer.
- Ask specifically about an assignment of rights under s.12 — this is the lawful mechanism, and KPDN has publicly confirmed it exists.
- Sell properly. Yes, it means clearing the loan or arranging redemption. That is the cost of a transaction that actually holds.
If you are tempted to buy one:
- You will not own the car. You cannot register it. You cannot insure it in your own name properly. You cannot sell it.
- If the seller stops paying or the bank repossesses, you lose the deposit and the car.
- Listings on marketplaces and WhatsApp groups highlight low monthly payments and minimal upfront cost. They rarely mention that the agreement is unenforceable.
If you are already in one:
- Get advice. Approaching the bank about a s.12 assignment may be possible depending on the financier and your standing.
- Do not simply keep going quietly. The registered owner is accumulating summonses, credit risk and potential criminal exposure the whole time.
FAQ
Is sambung bayar illegal in Malaysia?
Selling or disposing of a vehicle under a hire purchase agreement without the financier's consent is an offence under s.38 of the Hire Purchase Act 1967, carrying up to RM30,000 or 3 years' imprisonment, or both.
Is the contract enforceable if we both signed?
No. Under s.24 of the Contracts Act 1950, an agreement with an unlawful object is void from the start. Neither party can enforce it.
Who gets the summonses?
The registered owner — the original hirer — because fines are issued against the owner, not the driver.
Can the bank repossess even though I've been paying?
Yes. If the loan defaults, the financier can repossess regardless of who is currently using the car.
Is there any legal way to have someone else take over payments?
KPDN's enforcement director-general has stated that an assignment of rights under s.12 of the Hire Purchase Act 1967 is permitted. Speak to the financier about that route.
What if the seller takes the car back after I've paid?
That may fall under s.420 of the Penal Code (cheating), but your contractual position is weak because the agreement is void. Get advice.
This article is general legal information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create a lawyer–client relationship.
Specific to this article: penalty figures under ss.38 and 46 of the Hire Purchase Act 1967 are drawn from press and practitioner sources rather than a statutory reprint we retrieved in full — verify at agc.gov.my. Whether a s.12 assignment of rights is available in your case depends entirely on the financier's terms and consent, and this article does not suggest any particular arrangement will be approved. Whether conduct amounts to an offence under s.420 of the Penal Code is fact-specific. If you are already in a sambung bayar arrangement, or facing repossession or enforcement, take legal advice rather than acting on a general article.
Spot something outdated or wrong? Tell us — we’ll verify and correct it, with the correction noted.
Key sources (8) — how this was verified
- AskLegal existing page, "5 legal reasons you should never take part in a Sambung Bayar deal" — the quoted text of s.38 of the Hire Purchase Act 1967; the explanation that the bank owns the car until the loan is paid off so the hirer has no right to sell without the bank's arrangement; the penalty of up to RM30,000 and/or up to 3 years' imprisonment; and s.24 of the Contracts Act 1950 rendering sambung bayar contracts void ab initio and unenforceable: https://asklegal.my/p/5-reasons-to-not-sambung-bayar-malaysia
- Paul Tan, May 2023, "Sambung bayar contracts are not legally valid – KPDN" — KPDN Director-General of Enforcement Datuk Azman Adam's statement that any contract signed for the purpose of continuing vehicle payments under a sambung bayar scheme is not legally valid; the condition in the hire purchase agreement that the lessee cannot sell the vehicle without the owner's permission, with breach being an offence to defraud the owner; and crucially his statement that this does not mean someone else cannot pay for the vehicle and use it, as an assignment of rights under a hire purchase agreement is permitted under Section 12 of the Hire Purchase Act 1967: https://paultan.org/2023/05/23/sambung-bayar-contracts-are-not-legally-valid-kpdn/
- Paul Tan, December 2017, "Sambung bayar car sellers to be fined, jailed – report" — the Home Ministry's written reply to the Dewan Rakyat confirming that action can be taken against owners who pawn their vehicles or sambung bayar to third parties without the bank's knowledge and approval, and that enforcement of the Act sits with KPDN: https://paultan.org/2017/12/22/sambung-bayar-car-sellers-to-be-fined-jailed-report/
- Qoala Malaysia, "11 Risks of Continue Car Loan You Should Consider" — s.38 and s.46 of the Hire Purchase Act 1967, the latter carrying a fine up to RM3,000 or imprisonment up to 6 months; the position that a sambung bayar car sold to a new owner is still considered the property of the original owner even if an agreement has been made; and the consequence that traffic fines and legal action are imposed on the original registered owner, not the driver: https://www.qoala.my/en/blog/asset-management/continue-car-loan/
- SAYS, May 2026, "What Is 'Sambung Bayar' And Why It's Illegal In Malaysia" — the five risks: no legal ownership protection for the buyer; debt and responsibility remaining with the original owner including credit score damage; risk of fraud falling under s.420 of the Penal Code (cheating); vehicle seizure where the bank repossesses regardless of who is using the car; and financial loss with no recovery because the agreement is not legally protected; and the observation that such deals spread through online marketplaces and WhatsApp groups highlighting low monthly payments while rarely mentioning the legal risks: https://says.com/my/lifestyle/what-is-sambung-bayar-illegal
- Carro Malaysia, "Why you should avoid sambung bayar deals" — the explanation of how the arrangement works and why it is attractive to both sides; and the point that if the buyer stops paying, the original owner is left holding the bag because ownership remains with them: https://carro.co/my/blog/why-avoid-sambung-bayar
- Carlist.my, "All You Need to Know About 'Sambung Bayar' Schemes" — the confirmation that since the vehicle remains under the seller's name after a sambung bayar transaction, late instalment payments and summonses remain the seller's responsibility: https://www.carlist.my/news/all-you-need-to-know-about-sambung-bayar-schemes-77386/77386
- Wikipedia, Hire-Purchase Act 1967 — the Act's structure in its current form (30 July 2012), comprising 9 Parts, 58 sections and 7 schedules including 10 amendments: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hire-Purchase_Act_1967