AskLegal.my

Taking A Foreign Citizenship Does Not Automatically Cost You Your Malaysian One. The Government Has To Decide.

13 min read

The most common misconception about Malaysian citizenship is that it vanishes by itself.

It does not. As Malaysian practitioner commentary puts it: "A common misconception about holding dual citizenship in Malaysia is that once a Malaysian accepts foreign citizenship, he is automatically deprived of his Malaysian citizenship. This is inaccurate as the process for deprivation of citizenship does not happen automatically."

Two things follow:

Deprivation is a discretionary government decision, not an automatic consequence. Under Article 24, the Government has the discretion to deprive a person of citizenship if satisfied they voluntarily acquired citizenship of another country.

Only the Federal Government can do it. The power does not lie with government agencies such as the National Registration Department or the Immigration Department. The Court of Appeal confirmed in The Speaker of Dewan Undangan Negeri of Sarawak v Ting Tiong Choon [2018] 12 MLJ 176 that deprivation may only validly be undertaken by the Federal Government under Articles 24 and 27, or by voluntary renunciation under Article 23.

The two ways citizenship ends

Renunciation (Art 23)Deprivation (Arts 24–26A)
Initiated byYouThe Federal Government
Automatic?No — a formal applicationNo — a decision plus procedure
GroundsYour own choiceForeign citizenship, exercise of foreign rights, prolonged absence, fraud, and others

JPN's own framing: "As a sovereign nation, Malaysia does not recognise dual citizenship. Therefore, Malaysian citizens who hold foreign citizenship may voluntarily renounce their Malaysian citizenship, rather than being deprived of it under Articles 24, 25 or 26 of the Federal Constitution."

The grounds for deprivation

Article 24(1) — acquiring citizenship of another country by registration, naturalisation, or other voluntary and formal act other than marriage.

Article 24(2) — where a Malaysian has voluntarily claimed and exercised in another country any rights available under the law of that country.

On the passport point specifically: commentary states that a Malaysian found using a foreign passport will be deemed to have voluntarily claimed and exercised a right accorded exclusively to citizens of that foreign country, giving the Government good reason to exercise its discretion under Article 24.

Article 25 — includes deprivation on grounds relating to prolonged absence. Reporting notes that a naturalised Malaysian living abroad must register at a Malaysian consulate every year, and that missing this for five consecutive years gives grounds for revocation.

Article 26 — citizenship obtained through fraud, false representation or concealment of material facts.

Article 26A — a further deprivation provision.

Children. Where a person has renounced citizenship or been deprived under Article 24(1) or Article 26(1)(a), the Federal Government may by order deprive of citizenship any child of that person under 21 who was registered as a citizen as being that person's child, or the child of that person's spouse.

The safeguards that do exist

These are constitutional, and worth knowing.

A public good test. Under Article 27(2), no person shall be deprived of citizenship under Articles 25, 26 or 26A unless the Federal Government is satisfied that it is not conducive to the public good that they continue to be a citizen.

A statelessness bar. No person shall be deprived under Article 25, Article 26(1)(b) or Article 26A if the Federal Government is satisfied that as a result of the deprivation they would become stateless.

Note the gap. That statelessness protection is expressed for those provisions — it is not framed as covering Article 24 or Article 26(1)(a). That distinction matters and has been the subject of reform argument.

Notice and an inquiry. Before making a deprivation order, the Government must give written notice of the grounds and offer the person a right to have the case referred to an independent inquiry committee chaired by someone with judicial experience.

Merdeka Day protection. A person who became a citizen by operation of law on Merdeka Day, having been a citizen of the Federation immediately before, shall not be deprived under Article 24(1) or (2) by reason of anything done on or before that day.

Liability survives. Renunciation or deprivation does not discharge a person from liability in respect of anything done or omitted before they ceased to be a citizen. Giving up citizenship does not erase debts, obligations or criminal exposure.

How to renounce

Renunciation is under Article 23, and is done through a Malaysian mission abroad or JPN.

The Embassy of Malaysia in Washington's published requirements give a representative picture. Applicants must attend in person for thumbprints at the Consular Section with:

  • Form K (2 sets)
  • Original Malaysian passport
  • Original Malaysian identity card
  • Original Malaysian birth certificate
  • Foreign passport

Requirements differ between missions — check with the one handling your case.

What it costs you

The decision is, for most practical purposes, permanent.

Article 18(2) makes explicit that a person who previously renounced or was deprived of Malaysian citizenship generally cannot be registered as a citizen again without the approval of the Federal Government.

Practical consequences reported:

  • EPF — once you have formally renounced or received a deprivation order, you can withdraw your entire EPF balance
  • Property rights are affected
  • The passport, and everything downstream of it

Understand the sequence. A renunciation is not a step to be taken while you are still deciding.

The 2024 amendments and the criticism

Constitutional citizenship amendments passed in 2024 were strongly contested, and this article reports the objections as made.

The Malaysian Bar "strongly condemned" what it called regressive amendments, invoking Article 15 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights — that the right to nationality is a fundamental human right, and that recognition as a lawful citizen affords legal privileges including suffrage, social security, healthcare, public education and employment.

The specific objection on Article 26(2): the amendment replaced "date of the marriage" with "date of obtaining citizenship" as the reference point for deprivation where a marriage dissolves within two years.

Why critics said that matters: if a Malaysian man's marriage dissolves within two years of his foreign wife being granted Malaysian citizenship, she faces deprivation — and because Malaysia does not recognise dual citizenship, she would have relinquished her original nationality to obtain the Malaysian one, potentially rendering her stateless.

Family Frontiers argued the change was unjustifiable, noting that the Ministry of Home Affairs had not documented a single case of marriage of convenience nor collected reliable data, as confirmed by the Deputy Minister of Home Affairs during a Parliamentary Special Chambers session on 12 March 2024. Its January 2022 survey of 65 foreign spouses who had applied for Permanent Residence since 2014 found over 58% waited more than four years for a response, 23% were rejected without reasons, and no approvals were granted.

Their proposed fix: extend the protection in Article 26B(2) to Article 26(2), so that a foreign wife is not deprived where deprivation would render her stateless.

This article does not adjudicate that debate, but readers dealing with a spousal citizenship question should be aware the position changed in 2024 and take advice.

What to actually do

If you have acquired foreign citizenship:

  • Do not assume you have lost Malaysian citizenship. Deprivation requires a Federal Government decision and the Article 27 procedure.
  • Do not assume you have kept it either. Using a foreign passport is precisely the conduct Article 24(2) targets.
  • Get advice before travelling on either document.

If you receive a deprivation notice:

  • You are entitled to written notice of the grounds.
  • You may request referral to an independent inquiry committee chaired by a person with judicial experience. Use it.
  • Get a lawyer immediately.

If you are considering renouncing:

  • Understand that Article 18(2) makes return contingent on Federal Government approval.
  • Deal with EPF, property and any liabilities as part of the decision, not after.
  • Contact the relevant Malaysian mission for the current form and document list.

FAQ

Does Malaysia allow dual citizenship?

No. Malaysia does not recognise dual citizenship, and JPN's position is that citizens holding foreign citizenship may voluntarily renounce rather than be deprived.

Do I lose my citizenship automatically if I take another?

No. Deprivation is a discretionary decision of the Federal Government under Article 24, following the Article 27 procedure. It does not happen automatically.

Who can take my citizenship away?

Only the Federal Government. Not the National Registration Department, and not the Immigration Department.

Can using a foreign passport cost me my citizenship?

It can provide grounds. Commentary states that a Malaysian using a foreign passport is deemed to have voluntarily claimed and exercised a right accorded exclusively to citizens of that country, engaging Article 24(2).

What protections apply?

The Government must be satisfied deprivation is not conducive to the public good under Articles 25, 26 or 26A; must not deprive under Article 25, Article 26(1)(b) or Article 26A where the person would be rendered stateless; and must give written notice of grounds and offer referral to an independent inquiry committee chaired by someone with judicial experience.

Can my children lose citizenship too?

Where a parent renounces or is deprived under Article 24(1) or 26(1)(a), the Federal Government may by order deprive a child under 21 who was registered as a citizen as that person's child.

How do I renounce?

Under Article 23, through a Malaysian mission or JPN. One mission's published requirements are Form K in duplicate, original Malaysian passport, identity card and birth certificate, the foreign passport, and attendance in person for thumbprints.

Can I get it back?

Generally not without Federal Government approval — Article 18(2) makes that restriction explicit, so the decision is for practical purposes permanent.

Does renouncing clear my debts?

No. Renunciation or deprivation does not discharge liability for anything done or omitted before ceasing to be a citizen.

This article is general legal information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create a lawyer–client relationship.

Specific to this article: citizenship provisions were amended in 2024 and the amendments were contested, including a change to the reference point in Article 26(2) which critics argued could render foreign wives stateless — verify the current text of Part III of the Federal Constitution at agc.gov.my, since the summaries here draw on secondary sources and commentary including material predating those amendments. The statelessness safeguard is expressed in relation to Articles 25, 26(1)(b) and 26A and this article does not assert that it extends to Article 24 or 26(1)(a) — that distinction was the subject of reform argument and should be checked. The annual consulate registration requirement and five-year rule described under Article 25 come from secondary reporting rather than a provision we retrieved in full. Renunciation requirements differ between Malaysian missions; the document list given is one mission's published requirement. Consequences for EPF, property and other rights are described as reported and should be confirmed with the relevant institution before acting. Citizenship is a serious and largely irreversible matter — take legal advice before renouncing, and immediately if you receive a deprivation notice.

Spot something outdated or wrong? Tell us — we’ll verify and correct it, with the correction noted.

Key sources (8) — how this was verified
  • Constitution of Malaysia 1957, Part III, CommonLIIArticle 27(2): "No person shall be deprived of citizenship under Article 25, 26 or 26A unless the Federal Government is satisfied that it is not conducive to the public good that he should continue to be a citizen: and no person shall be deprived of citizenship under Article 25, paragraph (b) of Clause (1) of Article 26, or Article 26A if the Federal Government is satisfied that as a result of the deprivation he would [become stateless]"; the provision that where a person has renounced citizenship or been deprived under Article 24(1) or Article 26(1)(a), the Federal Government may by order deprive of citizenship any child of that person under twenty-one registered as a citizen as being the child of that person or of that person's spouse; the provision that renunciation or deprivation of citizenship shall not discharge a person from liability in respect of anything done or omitted before he ceased to be a citizen; and the Merdeka Day protection in Article 24(3): https://www.commonlii.org/my/legis/const/1957/3.html
  • MahWengKwai & Associates / Mondaq / vLex, "Dual Citizenship in Malaysia"Article 24 providing that any citizen who has acquired citizenship of another country may be deprived of Malaysian citizenship; the confirmation that the power to deprive lies with the Federal Government and not with agencies such as the National Registration Department or Immigration Department; the Government's discretion to deprive where satisfied the individual voluntarily acquired citizenship of a country outside Malaysia; the important clarification that "a common misconception about holding dual citizenship in Malaysia is that once a Malaysian accepts foreign citizenship, he is automatically deprived of his Malaysian citizenship. This is inaccurate as the process for deprivation of citizenship does not happen automatically", with a set of procedures under Article 27 which must be followed; the point that a person holding Malaysian citizenship found using a foreign passport will be deemed to have voluntarily claimed and exercised a right accorded exclusively to citizens of the foreign country, giving the Government good reason to exercise its discretion under Article 24; and the Court of Appeal in The Speaker of Dewan Undangan Negeri of Sarawak Datuk Amar Mohamad Asfia Awang Nassar v Ting Tiong Choon & Ors [2018] 12 MLJ 176, that while Malaysia does not recognise dual citizenship, any deprivation may only be validly undertaken by the Federal Government pursuant to Articles 24 and 27, or by voluntary renunciation under Article 23: https://mahwengkwai.com/dual-citizenship-in-malaysia/, https://www.mondaq.com/general-immigration/966516/ and https://vlex.com/vid/dual-citizenship-in-malaysia-846617718
  • BERNAMA, "No Policy Change In Case Of Dual Citizenship Holders Surrendering MyKad"JPN's clarification that "as a sovereign nation, Malaysia does not recognise dual citizenship. Therefore, Malaysian citizens who hold foreign citizenship may voluntarily renounce their Malaysian citizenship, rather than being deprived of it under Articles 24, 25 or 26 of the Federal Constitution", issued following a news clip circulating on social media that was interpreted out of context: https://www.bernama.com/en/news.php?id=2503691
  • Malay Mail, 21 March 2019 — then Home Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin's statement that Malaysia does not recognise dual citizenship; that Malaysians who obtained citizenship of another country by registration, naturalisation or other voluntary and formal act other than marriage could be deprived under Article 24(1); and that deprivation could also be done under Article 24(2) for any Malaysian who voluntarily claimed and exercised in another country any rights available under the law of that country: https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2019/03/21/malaysia-does-not-recognise-dual-citizenship-says-home-minister/1735018
  • LegalClarity, April 2026, "Does Malaysia Allow Dual Citizenship? Laws and Penalties" — Article 18(2) making explicit that anyone who previously renounced or was deprived of Malaysian citizenship generally cannot be registered as a citizen again without approval from the Federal Government, so the decision is for most practical purposes permanent; the point that a naturalised Malaysian living abroad must register at a Malaysian consulate every year, with five consecutive missed years giving grounds for revocation; Article 26 allowing deprivation where citizenship was obtained through fraud or concealment of material facts; the requirement that before making a deprivation order the government must give written notice of the grounds and offer the right to have the case referred to an independent inquiry committee chaired by someone with judicial experience; and the consequence that once citizenship is formally renounced or a deprivation order received, the entire EPF balance may be withdrawn: https://legalclarity.org/does-malaysia-allow-dual-citizenship/
  • Embassy of Malaysia, Washington, "Renunciation of Citizenship" — the requirement that Malaysian citizens wishing to renounce produce Form K (2 sets), original Malaysian passport, original Malaysian identity card, original Malaysian birth certificate and the foreign passport, and attend in person for thumbprints at the Consular Section: https://www.kln.gov.my/web/usa_washington/other_information/-/asset_publisher/2TQe/content/renunciation-of-citizenship
  • Malaysian Bar, "Press Release: The Malaysian Bar Strongly Condemns the Regressive Amendments to Citizenship Laws in Malaysia"the objection that amending Article 26(2) to replace "date of the marriage" with "date of obtaining citizenship" may lead to citizenship deprivation of foreign wives, because if a Malaysian man's marriage dissolves within two years of his wife being granted Malaysian citizenship she becomes exposed; and the Bar's position that the right to nationality is a fundamental human right under Article 15 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights, recognition as a lawful citizen affording privileges including suffrage, social security, healthcare, public education and gainful employment: https://www.malaysianbar.org.my/article/news/press-statements/press-statements/press-release-the-malaysian-bar-strongly-condemns-the-regressive-amendments-to-citizenship-laws-in-malaysia
  • Malay Mail, 26 March 2024, Family Frontiers commentary on the Constitution (Amendment) Bill 2024the concern that the amendment to Article 26(2) could render a previously non-citizen wife stateless, as Malaysia does not recognise dual citizenship and she would have relinquished her original nationality to obtain Malaysian citizenship; the argument that the amendment is unjustifiable as the Ministry of Home Affairs has not documented a single case of marriage of convenience nor collected reliable data, as confirmed by the Deputy Minister of Home Affairs during a Parliamentary Special Chambers session on 12 March 2024; the Family Frontiers survey of January 2022 involving 65 foreign spouses of Malaysians who applied for Permanent Residence since 2014, finding over 58 per cent waited over four years for a response, 23 per cent were rejected without reasons, and no approvals were granted; and the suggestion to expand the protection of Article 26B(2) to Article 26(2) so that a foreign wife shall not be deprived where deprivation would render her stateless: https://www.malaymail.com/news/what-you-think/2024/03/26/progressive-amendment-continues-to-leave-mothers-and-children-behind-family-frontiers/125609