AskLegal.my

Only A Magistrate Can Order Your Seized Property Back. And You Cannot Apply To Him Yourself.

11 min read

The single most useful thing to know about seized property in Malaysia is procedural, and it is counterintuitive.

Section 413 of the Criminal Procedure Code allows a Magistrate to take steps to ascertain the identity of the owner of seized property and make orders about it.

But the section does not give you a way to bring the matter before the Magistrate yourself.

The High Court put it plainly, in a passage later considered by the Federal Court:

"The most that the individual could do was to request the police to refer the matter to the magistrate under s 413 of the CPC for the necessary order to be made."

And the Federal Court clarified that only a Magistrate has the power and jurisdiction to proceed under s.413. Dato' Mary Lim FCJ took the view that the Court of Appeal should have given directions for compliance with s.413 rather than disposing of the matter by holding that the respondent was the beneficial owner.

So the practical route is: write to the police, asking them to refer the matter to a Magistrate under s.413. Not an application to the court. Not a demand to the station counter.

Where the rules live

Chapter XLI of the CPCDisposal of Exhibits and of Property the Subject of Offences — contains the framework:

SectionCovers
406ACourt shall consider the manner of disposal of exhibits
407Order for disposal of property regarding which an offence was committed
407ADisposal of seized articles
407BPenalty if property has been disposed of or concealed
408Direction instead of order
409Payment to an innocent person of money found on the accused
410Stay of order
411Destruction of libellous and other matter
412Restoration of possession of immovable property
413Procedure by police on seizure of property
414Procedure where no claim is established
415Procedure where property is perishable or of small value
416Procedure where the owner is absent

Note s.409. Where money is found on an accused person but belongs to someone innocent, there is a provision for payment to that person. And s.415 explains why perishable or low-value goods may be disposed of quickly rather than held.

Forfeiture is a different thing from seizure

Seizure is taking custody of property during an investigation. Forfeiture is the State permanently taking ownership.

Forfeiture powers sit in specific statutes, not the CPC:

  • AMLATFPUAA (anti-money laundering) — s.45 allows an investigating officer to seize any property reasonably believed to be the subject matter of a crime, terrorist property, proceeds of unlawful activities, or instrumentalities of an offence
  • MACC Act 2009 — the court may order forfeiture of property involved in the prosecution of gratification offences, on the Public Prosecutor's application to a Sessions Court
  • Dangerous Drugs (Forfeiture of Property) Act 1988
  • Penal Code ss.411–414

Two protections worth knowing:

If no forfeiture application is made, the property shall be released to the person from whom it was seized.

Third parties get notice. Where forfeiture is sought in circumstances where the person charged is not the true and lawful owner, the court must cause a notice in the gazette calling on third parties claiming an interest to attend and show cause why the property should not be forfeited. The standard is the balance of probabilities.

Timing matters. Academic commentary notes the significance of the requirement to make the forfeiture application within 12 months after the seizure or freezing order.

Forfeited property vests in the Government of Malaysia.

Scale illustration: in the 1MDB matter, civil forfeiture notices covered property and goods including jewellery, designer handbags, watches and sunglasses valued at RM680 million, plus a separate motion covering 27 luxury vehicles and money in 29 bank accounts amounting to RM31 million in appraised value.

Not the same as a Writ of Seizure and Sale

People conflate these constantly. A Writ of Seizure and Sale (WSS) is a civil enforcement tool — a judgment creditor recovering a debt, nothing to do with a criminal investigation.

How a WSS works: the court commands the Sheriff or Bailiff to seize and sell the judgment debtor's property to satisfy the judgment sum, by public auction, with proceeds channelled to the judgment creditor. For land, a prohibitory order is served on the land office preventing transfer or disposal.

Notably broad in scope. In one reported case a celebrity entrepreneur owing RM1.1 million had items seized including a PlayStation and an arcade machine.

Some property is protected, including property jointly owned, and seizure is subject to competing interests from chargees such as banks — particularly for real estate and vehicles.

What to actually do if police seize your property

  1. Get a seizure list. Insist on a written record of exactly what was taken, itemised, and keep your copy.
  2. Establish the basis. Ask which offence is under investigation and under what provision the seizure was made.
  3. Get the investigating officer's name, rank and contact.
  4. Write to the police — the OCS or the investigating officer — requesting that the matter be referred to a Magistrate under s.413 CPC. Keep a copy and a record of delivery. This is the route the High Court identified.
  5. Prove ownership. Receipts, registration documents, bank records, photographs, insurance. The s.413 process is about ascertaining the owner.
  6. If you are an innocent third party whose property was caught up in someone else's matter, say so clearly and in writing, and note s.409 where money is involved.
  7. Watch for a gazette notice if forfeiture proceedings are commenced, and attend to show cause.
  8. Get a lawyer if the value is significant or forfeiture is threatened. Correspondence from a firm is answered differently, and forfeiture proceedings are not something to face unrepresented.

On timing: if no forfeiture application is made, property should be released to the person from whom it was seized. Do not let months pass silently — put your claim on record early and in writing.

FAQ

Can I apply to court to get my seized property back?

Not directly under s.413. The Federal Court confirmed only a Magistrate has power to proceed under it, and the High Court held that the most an individual can do is request the police to refer the matter to the Magistrate.

What should I do then?

Write to the police requesting a referral to a Magistrate under s.413 CPC, with evidence of your ownership, and keep a copy.

Which law governs seized property?

Chapter XLI of the Criminal Procedure Code, covering disposal of exhibits and property the subject of offences, at ss.406A to 416.

What is the difference between seizure and forfeiture?

Seizure is custody during investigation. Forfeiture is a court order permanently transferring ownership to the Government, made under statutes such as the AMLATFPUAA, the MACC Act 2009 and the Dangerous Drugs (Forfeiture of Property) Act 1988.

What if the police never apply to forfeit it?

Where there is no such application, the property shall be released to the person from whom it was seized.

I am not the accused but my property was seized. What can I do?

Where forfeiture is sought and the person charged is not the true owner, the court must publish a gazette notice calling on third parties claiming an interest to attend and show cause. Section 409 also provides for payment to an innocent person of money found on an accused.

Can police auction off seized items?

Disposal of seized articles is governed by s.407A, with special provision in s.415 where property is perishable or of small value. Forfeited property vests in the Government.

Is a Writ of Seizure and Sale the same thing?

No. That is civil debt enforcement, where the Sheriff or Bailiff seizes and auctions a judgment debtor's property to pay a judgment creditor.

This article is general legal information, not legal advice, and reading it does not create a lawyer–client relationship.

Specific to this article: the procedural position on s.413 — that only a Magistrate may proceed under it and that individuals cannot bring the matter before the Magistrate directly — is drawn from practitioner analysis of the Federal Court and High Court decisions rather than from the judgments read in full; if significant property is involved, take advice on the correct route rather than relying on a general article. Forfeiture regimes differ substantially between the AMLATFPUAA, the MACC Act 2009 and the Dangerous Drugs (Forfeiture of Property) Act 1988, and the notice, standard of proof and timing requirements described are general and may not apply to your matter. The 12-month application period noted is drawn from academic commentary and should be verified against the applicable statute. Section numbering is from the reprinted CPC (Act 593); verify current text at agc.gov.my. Nothing here addresses seizures by agencies other than the police, which operate under their own statutes. If forfeiture proceedings have been commenced against property you claim, get a lawyer.

Spot something outdated or wrong? Tell us — we’ll verify and correct it, with the correction noted.

Key sources (7) — how this was verified
  • Criminal Procedure Code (Act 593), reprint hosted by PDRM CCIDChapter XLI, Disposal of Exhibits and of Property the Subject of Offences, comprising s.406A (court shall consider manner of disposal of exhibits), s.407 (order for disposal of property regarding which offence committed), s.407A (disposal of seized articles), s.407B (penalty if property has been disposed or concealed), s.408 (direction instead of order), s.409 (payment to innocent person of money found on accused), s.410 (stay of order), s.411 (destruction of libellous and other matter), s.412 (restoration of possession of immovable property), s.413 (procedure by police on seizure of property), s.414 (procedure where no claim established), s.415 (procedure where property is perishable or of small value) and s.416 (procedure where owner is absent): https://ccid.rmp.gov.my/Laws/Criminal_Prosedure_Code_Act_593.pdf and https://tcclaw.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/Criminal-Procedure-Code.pdf
  • Malaysian Litigator, "Police seized my property! Section 413 of the Criminal Procedure Code & the Federal Court's interpretation"the clarification that only a Magistrate had the power and jurisdiction to proceed under s.413 of the CPC; Dato' Mary Lim's view that the Court of Appeal should have given directions for compliance with s.413 instead of disposing of the matter and holding that the respondent was the beneficial owner; the settled position that s.413 allows a Magistrate to take steps to ascertain the identity of the owner of the property but does not provide an avenue for individuals to report the matter to a Magistrate; and the High Court's holding that "the most that the individual could do was to request the police to refer the matter to the magistrate under s 413 of the CPC for the necessary order to be made": https://malaysianlitigator.com/2020/11/06/police-seized-my-property-section-413-of-the-criminal-procedure-code-the-federal-courts-interpretation/
  • Azmi & Associates, "Forfeiture of Ill-gotten Assets Under Malaysian Law" — the position that where there is no application for forfeiture, the property shall be released to the person from whom it was seized; the requirement that before making a forfeiture order where the person charged is not the true and lawful owner and there is no prosecution, the court shall determine on a balance of probabilities whether the property falls within the criteria, and shall cause a notice in the gazette to be published calling upon third parties claiming an interest to attend before the court to show cause why the property should not be forfeited; the MACC Act 2009 power for the court to order forfeiture of property involved in the prosecution of gratification offences, on the Public Prosecutor's application to a Sessions Court; and that forfeited property vests in the Government of Malaysia: https://www.azmilaw.com/insights/forfeiture-of-ill-gotten-assets-under-malaysian-law/
  • IIUM Law Journal, "Civil Forfeiture Under Anti-Money Laundering" (2023) — the AMLATFPUAA as the main legislation for criminalising money laundering and terrorism financing and for the forfeiture and seizure of property derived from unlawful activities; s.45 AMLATFPUAA allowing an investigating officer to seize any property reasonably believed to be the subject matter of a crime, terrorist property, the proceeds of illegal activities, or the instrumentalities of an offence; the complementary laws including the Penal Code ss.411 to 414, the Dangerous Drugs (Forfeiture of Property) Act 1988 and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission Act 2009; and the significance of the requirement to make the forfeiture application within 12 months after the seizure or freezing order: https://journals.iium.edu.my/iiumlj/index.php/iiumlj/article/download/876/420/3103
  • Rule of Law (rulecolaw.com), "A Creditor's Guide To Writs Of Seizure & Sale In Malaysia" — the operation of a WSS as civil enforcement, with the court ordering seized movable assets to be sold by public auction if the judgment debtor fails to pay within the prescribed period; the prohibitory order served on the land office for real estate, preventing transfer, sale or disposal; the breadth of assets capable of seizure, illustrated by a reported case where a celebrity entrepreneur owing RM1.1 million had items seized including a PlayStation and an arcade machine; the protection of certain property including jointly owned property; and the complication of competing interests from chargees such as banks: https://www.rulecolaw.com/post/writ-of-seizure-sale
  • Office of the Chief Registrar, Federal Court of Malaysia, "What Do I Do With Court Order" — the process by which the Court commands the Sheriff or Bailiff to seize and sell the property of the judgment debtor to satisfy the judgment sum, carried out through an auction of the seized items with proceeds channelled to the judgment creditor; and the alternative garnishee application to attach monies in a judgment debtor's bank account: https://www.kehakiman.gov.my/en/what-do-i-do-court-order
  • Malay Mail, May 2019 and September 2020 — illustrations of the scale of civil forfeiture proceedings in the 1MDB matter, including notices covering property and goods such as jewellery, designer handbags, watches and sunglasses valued at RM680 million, a separate motion for 27 luxury vehicles, watches, bags and money in 29 bank accounts amounting to RM31 million in appraised value, and a later application concerning RM114,164,393.44 and jewellery seized by the MACC: https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2019/05/08/government-moves-to-forfeit-rm711m-of-items-seized-from-najib-rosmah/1750785 and https://malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2020/09/14/najib-umno-apply-for-separate-hearing-on-forfeiture-of-money-jewellery-seiz/1903112